My public comments to the Washington State Commission on Judicial Conduct

 By James O'Hagan Greetings Commissioners, I hope all is well with you and yours and I would like to thank you for giving me the opportunity to come before you and provide comment to you on the Washington State Judicial branch.  During my comments I will ask you questions that I don’t expect you to answer but consider how you would answer them. I can assure you it is not my intent to offend you, but it is my intent to address a different perspective of extremely important issues that are problematic with you.  Please feel free to stop me and ask me about any concerns you may have at any time.  

I would like to start by providing you a copy of my candidate statement for you to share. I would like to point out to you that the last time I ran for state representative I was incarcerated by members of the judicial branch who filed criminal charges on me on the eve of Election Day 2016 without any individual ever filing a criminal complaint against me. I can only hope you will not allow this Nazi Gestapo tactic of silencing political candidates to happen again.

I would like to also address the original action I filed with the U.S. Supreme Court with you.  It contains almost 800 pages of evidence that supports my request for them to end the violations to the separation of powers and remove every member of the judicial branch from our legislative and executive branches forever. 

In the evidence you will see that on behalf of the Pacific County Tea Party I filed criminal election crime complaints with all 39 prosecutors in Washington State, Attorney General Robert Ferguson and the Washington State Supreme Court Justices and placed them on notice that they had a duty to summon a Grand jury to investigate the criminal election crime complaints, as described in  RCW 36.27.020 Duties.  The prosecuting attorney shall: (9) Present all violations of the election laws which may come to the prosecuting attorney's knowledge to the special consideration of the proper jury;  .  

Instead of following the laws that protect our free elections, and the political power of the people most of the members of the judicial branch that was charged by law to protect us joined Robert Ferguson’s criminal conspiracy to overthrow our free elections and the political power of the people as described in RCW 9A.28.040 Criminal Conspiracy that states …(2) It shall not be a defense to criminal conspiracy that the person or persons with whom the accused is alleged to have conspired:  (f) Is a law enforcement officer or other government agent who did not intend that a crime be committed.   

I document the fact that Robert Ferguson violated his duty described in RCW 43.10.030 General Powers and Duties     The attorney General Shall:  (4) consult with and advise the several prosecuting attorneys in matters relating to the duties of their office.  and he and his coconspirators violated RCW 29A.84.720 and actually levied war against the people which is a form of treason and made him and them unfit to hold public office, and since all of you are part of the every persons described in RCW 29A.84.720 Officers—Violations generally. That states:  Every person charged with the performance of any duty under the provisions of any law of this state relating to elections, including primaries, or the provisions of any charter or ordinance of any city or town of this state relating to elections who willfully neglects or refuses to perform such duty, or who, in the performance of such duty, or in his or her official capacity, knowingly or fraudulently violates any of the provisions of law relating to such duty, is guilty of a class C felony punishable under RCW 9A.20.021 and shall forfeit his or her office.

These laws could not be more clear, it was and is, your duty by your oath of office to refrain from joining Mr. Ferguson’s  criminal conspiracy and see  that our laws are followed that requires a Grand jury investigation into his actions and remove him from public office if necessary.

All of the corruption I have exposed here is the result of the members of the judicial branch violating the separation of powers and infiltrating our legislative and executive branches to protect and enhance their judicial fraud industry that sells injustices to the highest bidders. When members of the judicial branch violate the separation of powers the judicial branch becomes political and focuses on politics instead of focusing on and protecting justice, had violations to the separation of powers not been an issue the members of the judicial branch would not have had any motive to violate their duties described by law. So I have to ask each of you are you more motivated to protect the violations to the separation of powers or are you more motivated to protect the political power of the people and our free and equal elections?

In this document I point out that Washington state has two state constitutions of which neither are valid. I had researchers at the Washington State archives help me research this and verify this fact. The 1878 Washington state constitution which complied with the equal footing doctrine was ratified by congress but not signed into effect by a president. The 1889 Constitution was not ratified by congress and was just signed into effect by a president who was violating the separation of powers and it did not and does not comply with the equal footing doctrine. The 1878 constitution strictly prohibited violating the separation of powers and the 1889 one omitted addressing it, most likely because it was written by attorneys for attorneys so they could enslave the people.

In this document I point out the fact that the Washington Counties Risk Pool is a scheme developed by attorneys to enhance their judicial fraud industry by holding innocent taxpayers responsible for the wrongful acts of public officials. I ask each of you what kind of person holds innocent people accountable for the actions of others, or enslaves people?  Black’s Law Dictionary described slaver as: “ The practice of keeping individuals in such a state of bondage or servitude” . It also points out that:  “ Slavery was outlawed by the 13^th amendment to the U.S. Constitution.” Therefore the people involved in using the Washington Counties risk pool to enslave innocent taxpayers are actually unlawful slave traders.  On the other hand the official bonding policy actually held public officials responsible and accountable for their own actions, so I believe it is your duty by your oath of office to uphold our constitutions to evaluate the social experiment involving the Washington Counties risk pool vs official bonding and make absolute certain the risk pool is not violating the 13^th amendment unless it is your belief that you should not be responsible for your duties or actions, such as the ones described in RCW 29A.84.720 Officers violations generally. I ask you how many people have been enslaved in the form of taxes to pay for contingency fees to attorneys associated with the Risk Pool scheme? And will you allow this embezzlement scheme initiated by attorneys (or modern day slave traders) violating the separation of powers, proceed to enslave innocent taxpayers?